Considering all this - could there be, to anyone endowed with reason, a [more] solemn evidence of the truth

Is all this ˹not˺ a sufficient oath for those who have sense?

is there not in [all] that an oath for a rational person?

hal fī dhālika qasamun lidhī ḥij'ri

Is in that (not) an oath for those who understand?

Considering all this - could there be, to anyone endowed with reason, a [more] solemn evidence of the truth

There surely is an oath for thinking man

Is there (not) in these an adjuration (or evidence) for those who understand

Is all this ˹not˺ a sufficient oath for those who have sense?

is there not in [all] that an oath for a rational person?

is there not in this strong evidence for a man of sense

Truly in that there is an oath for those who possess understanding

Is there not in that an oath to be sworn for a possessor of intelligence?

does that not contain an oath for someone who is mindful?

Are there not in them (above oaths) sufficient proofs for the people of understanding?

is there an oath therein for one who is mindful

Is in (all) this an evidence or testimony for a possessor of wisdom

Is there not in these an oath (enough evidence) for those who use their common sense

Is there in this an oath for a rational person

Is there in that an oath for a sensible person? (Literally: person owning sense)

Is this not a sufficient oath for intelligent people

__Is there (not) in such an oath (enough assurance) for a man of sense?_

Is not all this a solemn evidence for every thinking person

Is there a (more solemn) vow for the sensible ones

Is there (not) in these a Sign for those who understand

Is there [not] in [all] that an oath [sufficient] for one of perception

In this is an oath for the one with intelligence

is this oath strong enough for a rational person

Indeed in that there is an oath for a man of sense

Is there not an evidence in this for those who have sense

is there not in that an oath for the intelligent?

Is there not in that a solemn oath for one endowed with reason (to reflect upon, so that it may guide him to the truth and keep him away from evils)

Is there an oath in that for one possessing intellect

Is there not in these a lesson (evidence or admonition) for a man of understanding

Is there an oath in that for one who has understanding

Is there not in these an oath for those who understand

Isn’t there a convincing oath for an intelligent person?

Is there in this an oath for one endowed with understanding

Is there in that an oath for he who is confined?

Is there in this an oath for one with understanding?

Is there not in it an oath for man of understanding?

A profound oath, for one who possesses intelligence

Is there in that an oath for the mindful

Truly in this is an oath for men of understanding

Is in that an oath to (those) of (E) a mind

Indeed in all these oaths there are subjects of thought for the thinkers

Why is there an oath in this, for the intelligent

Is there not in it strong evidence for one possessed of understanding

Surely, in that is a mighty oath for the wise

In it there is surely a strong evidence for one who has sense and understanding

There is indeed in them (the above oaths) sufficient proofs for men of understanding (and that, they should avoid all kinds of sins and disbeliefs, etc.)

Is there in that an oath for a mindful man

Is there not in this an oath formed with understanding

Is there in that an oath for a man of sense

Is there not in this an oath becoming a man of sense

Is there not in this a mighty oath for a man of sense

In these, can evidence not be found by those with understanding?

does that not contain an oath for someone who is mindful?

Is there not in that an oath for a man of sense?

Is there not in this a (sufficient) oath for a man of reason?

Is there not an oath in this for a thinking person

Is there not enough assertion in these corroboratory facts for those who ponder

For one who has sense, these (items) are surely worth being sworn by.

Is there (not) in these an adjuration (or evidence) for those who understand

Is in that (not) an oath for those who understand